CONTRACT / COPYRIGHT
Record labels, artistes
It seems that Sony and a group of artistes including Cheap Trick, the Allman Brothers and the Youngbloods have come to an agreed settlement in their dispute over the appropriate royalties the label should be paying the artistes – the label want to pay a ‘per unit’ royalty as they would with vinyl and CDs with various deductions meaning the royalty is reduced to a faction of the sale price, with the artistes arguing that their proper share was one half of all digital licensing income, less only publishing royalties.
The settlement, proposed by the plaintiffs in a court filing, has yet to be approved by the court, but proposes that Sony will pay its recording artists a total $7.95 million to resolve outstanding claims in the case. Lawyers’ fees alone will account for $2.5 million of this (The case has been running since 2006). The deal also provides for a 3 percent “bump” in artists’ royalty rates with respect to digital income – seemingly acknowledging that digital royalties should be higher than those for physical product. My previous post on the recent Kenny Rogers claim over his royalties highlighted some of the more unsavoury activities of labels when it comes to reducing artiste royalties. A substantial portion of the pot ($5 million), if approved, will go to artists who had at least 28,500 total downloads on Apple’s iTunes: A much smaller share (just $300,000) has been set aside for artists whose download levels weren’t very significant.
What remains unclear is who is actually party to the settlement with rumours that Cheap Trick and The Allman Brother actually agreed a separate and confidential deal from the “class” which seemingly includes any recording artiste signed to Epic, Columbia or Arista Records in the US between 1976 and 2001 – who would be entitled to a share of the one-off settlement and the 3% increase in royalties which actually equates to just 3% if 70 cents (from a 99cent download) or 2.1 cents per sale on iTunes.