A long running legal spat in the US over the extent of the rights the Jimi Hendrix estate has to prevent others from selling goods using the late guitarist’s likeness has moved forward, with an appeals court overturning a contentious 2011 ruling on the matter. The difficulty for the Estate is that so called ‘publicity rights’, or mage rights, are complex as US protection comes from state law, and some states protect the name and image of dead stars and others do not.
The dispute involves the Hendrix Estate, and HendrixLicensing.com: Hendrix’s brother Leon has an involvement in HendrixLicensing.com, while their adopted sister Janie manages the Estate. Although Hendrix was resident in New York at the time of his death – a state where posthumous publicity rights do not apply – the estate’s company Experience Hendrix has endeavoured to stop HendrixLicensing.com from selling goods in Washington, a state where such rights are on the statute book.
In 2011, in what was a surprising decision, a Washington judge ruled that using the state’s publicity right laws in this way was unconstitutional, in that it violated some rules set out by the US Constitution. That ruling limited the use of Washington’s state laws on publicity rights where interstate dealings were involved. However, this week the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals overturned that judgement. Admitting that the matter “raises difficult questions regarding whether another state must recognise the broad personality rights that Washington provides”, the appeals judge said that, nonetheless, this case was specifically about HendrixLicensing.com trading in Washington state, so concerns about applying the publicity rights laws were limited. The appeals court also made rulings favourable to the Hendrix Estate on trademark and damages issues. It remains to be seen where this dispute goes next.
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/jimi-hendrix-estate-wins-appeal-675297 and more on the 2011 decision here http://www.musiclawupdates.com/?p=1153